1:1 Construction |
| DESCRIPTION: In the traditional design process, architects are usually limited to the production of drawings and models for the purpose of a) recording ideas in an iterative design process, and b) communicating ideas and concepts to others. Rarely are architects able to build full-size mockups due to time or budgetary constraints. However, hands-on experience bringing a project all the way from design through to final production and construction is a valuable asset to have. Using traditional and digital production tools, Dr. Howe has conducted numerous studios that result in full-size 1:1 construction projects as their final product. The projects are small enough to have small budgets with simple limited infrastructure elements, such as kiosks, workstations, small shelters, and furniture. In the production of 1:1 mockup analogues, cheap materials are used to approximate the behvior of actual materials which may be too costly to actually obtain. Thus cardboard stock can approximate sheet metal, etc. However, when available, real materials are prefered in 1:1 structures. OBJECTIVES: All studios and courses taught by Dr. Howe under the Construction / engineering theme rigorously conform with National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB) Condition 13 Criterion 7 "Collaborative Skills", Criterion 15 "Sustainable Design", Criterion 18 "Structural Systems", Criterion 19 "Environmental Systems", Criterion 21 "Building Envelope Systems", Criterion 22 "Building Service Systems", Criterion 23 "Building Systems Integration", and Criterion 24 "Building Materials and Assemblies". Dr. Howe also emphasizes a link with Criterion 3 "Graphic Skills", Criterion 4 "Research Skills", Criterion 5 "Formal Ordering Systems", and Criterion 6 "Fundamental Design Skills". INPUT / CONSTRAINTS:
OUTPUT / DELIVERABLES:
EXAMPLE STUDENT WORK: Dr. Howe taught a 1:1 tensile structures studio (UofO, arch484/584 vertical studio, 2000-01) co-taught with Christine Theodoropoulos, the students were Dan Barker, Roger Binschus, Seth Ehlinger, Chris Harnish, Travis Jermain, Padru Kang, Andika Murandi, Omid Nasari, Adam Olsen, Glen Pak, Jessica Ruben, and David White, Kevin Banton, Andrew Curtis, Winston Ely, Kevin Gerlits, Cheryl Jacobs, Grace Leung, Timothy Moon, Ian O'Banion, Ian Roll, George Schweikart, Matthew Smith, John Stapleton, Chad Weltzin, Andrew Wenrick, and Philip Yuen. The students split up into groups and created several 1:1 tensile structures including a bicycle parking structure (figure 1 and figure 2), a small pavilion (figure 3), and a sculpture (figure 4).
Dr. Howe co-designed and constructed a working robotic kiosk with grad students Padru Kang and Omid Nasari (UofO, arch584 graduate design studio, 2000-01). The kiosk was modeled in a solid modeling program, outputted to laser-cutters, manufactured, assembled, and brought to working order in two months (Figure 5).
Richard Seewhy Lee (HKU, arch4001/4002 graduate design studio, 2002-03), as part of a digital manufacturing course, came up with some initial ideas for a small work station, later refined by Dr. Howe. The Diginoid workstation was completely manufactured using digital means, including the membrane which was produced by a digital sail cutter (figure 6 and figure 7).
Dr. Howe assisted Eve Tracy and her design studio members (HKU, arch2013 2nd year design studio, 2004-05) in the design and construction of a drafting workstation (Figure 8).
Scott Howe design studio members (HKU, arch2013 2nd year design studio, 2005-06) digitally produced a display system consisting of cubes (figure 9 and figure 10).
|
| A Scott Howe, PhD |